The most noticeable fallacy Essay Example for Free

The most pronounced fallacy EssayThere be numerous examples of bias, fallacies, and specific empty wordsal devices in the speech. First of all, none of electoral speeches can be regarded as unbiased for the ample reason there are covert political, ethical, and pragmatic considerations influencing the impartiality of any such speech. It is evident that the speaker unit system system is biased against Jim W. Gettys and regards this person as the shit of all problems in the state. As concerns logical fallacies, they are abundant. The most noticeable fallacy is Ad HominemAn Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument (The Nizkor Project, 2008, Fallacy Ad Hominem). In this fact, the speaker is attacking Jim W. Gettys personality rather than specific proposals or policy. In this particular case, Ad Hominem Abusive, or Personal Attac k, is present because the speaker uses abusive remarks instead of evidence. For instance, the speaker makes unsubstantiated claims about Gettys extension of powers. Another fallacy committed is the Slippery listThe Slippery peddle is a fallacy in which a person asserts that some event must inevitably note from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question (The Nizkor Project, 2008, Fallacy Slippery Slope). The speaker assumes that he or she will definitely become the Governor simply because opinion survey say so. Appeal to Pity can also be regarded as employed in the rhetoric surrounding the issue of working mean and slum children.Speaking about rhetorical devices, the speech features repeat (The working man The working man and the slum child ), hyperbole, or using exaggeration to get hold of greater effect (I will do everything in my power to entertain ), and various forms of emotive lyric poem. The speaker often employs the so-called rule of t hree The rule of three is based on the technique that volume tend to remember three things (Presentation Helper, 2008, The Rule of Three). For example, this rule is used in the promise to protect the underprivileged, the underpaid, and the underfed or in the announcement of the intent to arrange for indictment, prosecution, and conviction of Gettys.In fact, there are few fully developed arguments presented in the speech and no counterarguments. The speaker makes a constructive case trying to press his or her own agenda through without paying due attention to the send of the opponent and avoiding the real debate. Assessing the overall effectiveness of the speech, it is necessary to admit that it might have a moderate appeal to people who rely on emotional rather than rational judgment. The speech uses affirmative language that has potential of influencing certain segments of society on subconscious level.Yet any in-depth analysis of the arguments delivered by the speaker will unve il the unsubstantiated nature of all the claims, coupled with numerous logical fallacies. In parliamentary procedure for a speech to be effective, emotional and rational appeal should be both present and intimately balanced. References Presentation Helper. (2008). The Rule of Three. Retrieved January 21, 2008, from http//www. presentationhelper. co. uk/rule_of_three. htm The Nizkor Project. (2008). Fallacies. Retrieved January 21, 2008, from http//www. nizkor. org/features/fallacies